|
|
Post by Ɲoquisi on Aug 19, 2011 17:40:26 GMT -5
I hope not! We should be able to do both.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blue on Aug 20, 2011 9:18:46 GMT -5
No, we still are Kylarad, we just have the choice.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oxy on Aug 20, 2011 22:02:02 GMT -5
;D I would have asked this myself, but cha beat me to it. Anyway, thanks for clearing that up ^^
|
|
|
|
Post by Blue on Aug 24, 2011 7:56:37 GMT -5
kit, no offence but i hate your fox picture
|
|
|
|
Post by Ɲoquisi on Aug 24, 2011 8:45:08 GMT -5
Why? I think it's cute.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oxy on Aug 24, 2011 11:11:10 GMT -5
...Why? You basically hate everything fox related. I'm not taking it down D:
|
|
|
|
Post by ƴanaϦ on Aug 24, 2011 21:57:34 GMT -5
No fighting on this thread please XD so we have a new alliance with a brand new pack. I'm not so sure about this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blue on Aug 25, 2011 15:31:39 GMT -5
Alliance=good
Foxes= crap
|
|
|
|
Post by Oxy on Aug 25, 2011 17:21:17 GMT -5
 Bluuuue D;
|
|
|
|
Post by ƴanaϦ on Aug 25, 2011 17:42:11 GMT -5
Back to the subject at hand. Our new alliance is with a pack who has no members. This could prove hazardous for us.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ɲoquisi on Aug 26, 2011 13:07:37 GMT -5
How?
|
|
|
|
Post by Blue on Aug 27, 2011 11:41:22 GMT -5
Pack picture (?)  (enlarge it) |
|
|
|
Post by Sunny on Aug 28, 2011 8:50:41 GMT -5
A pack with no members in it? Isn't that a bit of an oxymoron?
|
|
|
|
Post by Blue on Aug 28, 2011 8:52:28 GMT -5
watcha mean?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sunny on Aug 28, 2011 8:53:50 GMT -5
How can you have a pack with no members? It's not really a pack if no one is in it, right?
|
|
Bluuuue D;
